Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When is a better LLM worth paying for? Stochastic Optimization with Switching Mixed-Fidelity Oracles

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used upstream of decision-making to clean data, detect label errors, and reconstruct missing values. Yet LLM-assisted data curation creates a new operational tradeoff: higher-fidelity models and richer prompts can be substantially more expensive, while the value of this additional fidelity depends on the downstream optimization accuracy. This raises the central question of this work: when should one pay for a better LLM, given a specific downstream task at hand? We study this question through stochastic optimization with mixed-fidelity first-order oracles, which can have systematic bias and state-dependent variance. We develop two cost-aware a...

AuthorsSwati Gupta, Tianjiao Li
Primary categorymath.OC
Published15 October 2026
Last updated at source15 October 2026
math.OCcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c5ffc2fd-864a-4dde-987e-fa7f29b32a90" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.