Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Confidence-Calibrated Inference Expansion for Evaluator-Guided Test-Time Reasoning

Evaluator-guided reasoning presents a local control problem at every step: trust the current answer, return a fallback, or spend more inference. We formulate this choice as a compute-aware three-action controller, scoring terminal actions by predicted answer success and expansion by a rollout-based continuation-success surrogate, with compute cost priced explicitly. A local action-gap analysis characterizes when score errors can change a decision, while an expected regret bound accounts for errors along the realized expansion path. Guided by this analysis, we learn and calibrate action-specific confidence estimates, with local uncertainty penalties for ambiguous decisions. On held-out wid...

AuthorsWeida Liang, Kenji Kawaguchi
Primary categorycs.AI
Published14 October 2026
Last updated at source14 October 2026
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e6f4ec34-cab8-4e46-a123-c6f8858cfab1" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.