Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

More Methods, Better Agents? A Reality Check on Self-Distillation in Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Self-distillation in agentic reinforcement learning has produced a growing number of methods. However, existing evaluations often reuse published baseline scores under differing experimental conditions, provide few direct comparisons among contemporaneous methods, and give limited attention to training stability and computational cost. These limitations obscure the source of reported gains and the practical strengths and weaknesses of competing methods. Costly agent training further motivates a common basis for comparison. To address these gaps, we compare ten representative methods against GRPO on ALFWorld, ScienceWorld, Search-QA, and WebShop across three model sizes. Our study comprise...

AuthorsLinhao Zhong, Bozhen Fang, Xuehao Wang et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published14 October 2026
Last updated at source14 October 2026
cs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/59cc0768-ea8a-4d24-b814-a72db6750155" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.