Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Learning to Compute Is Not Learning to Retain or Reuse in Looped Transformers

Looped transformers compute by applying one block repeatedly, so they can run for more loops than they were trained with. Recurrent reasoners are known to overthink: iterating past the trained depth can turn a correct answer into a wrong one. Such a late error can reflect failed computation, loss of retention, or a state that later computation cannot reuse. We separate these cases in in-context Mealy-machine execution, where a simulator supplies intermediate targets and exact counterfactuals for hidden-state interventions. Models trained to answer at loop 32 are fully correct there but keep only 22% of these answers at loop 64. Retention depends on what training asks for: supervising one ...

AuthorsPeilong Zhou, Hongtao Zhang, Yulong Huang et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published14 October 2026
Last updated at source14 October 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/941d125d-a8b3-4872-8f03-1a034fb36ad8" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.