Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Are We Really Measuring Forgetting? Pitfalls in Evaluating Machine Unlearning for Multimodal LLMs

As machine unlearning for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) rapidly advances, rigorous evaluation of its effectiveness becomes increasingly important. However, existing benchmarks largely inherit evaluation protocols from text-only unlearning and overlook the unique challenges of unlearning in multimodal settings. In this work, we identify three major pitfalls that may lead to misleading conclusions: the lack of heldout evaluation to distinguish genuine concept-wise forgetting from instance-wise overfitting, the reliance on synthetic, fine-tuned knowledge rather than real-world knowledge acquired during pre-training, and unfair method comparisons caused by applying the same trainin...

AuthorsOscar Chew, Po-Yi Lu, Yi-Jie Cheng et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published14 October 2026
Last updated at source14 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/67e17051-2f85-4e6b-9c9f-b3d430d7154d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.