Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Fantastic Metrics and How to Find Them: Meta-Evaluating Metrics for Multi-lingual Style-Personalized Generation

Meta-evaluation of text generation metrics and LLM-judges is primarily conducted using metric-human correlations. However, prior work has shown that correlation is not an appropriate estimate of a metric's evaluation capability and can be unstable across evaluation settings, such as different datasets or languages. Therefore, we propose a regression-based meta-evaluation of metrics that learns on calibrated metric outputs to predict human ratings. We ground this measurement relative to a trivial constant-mean baseline and human agreements to provide a comparable measure of metric capability across evaluation settings. To test our meta-evaluation framework, we developed a large-scale multi...

AuthorsAnubhav Jangra, Adrian de Wynter
Primary categorycs.CL
Published13 October 2026
Last updated at source13 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/15dd15cc-c279-4b85-ba37-3d5095c52cc8" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.