Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Revisiting Generative vs. Dense Retrieval: A Static Value Prior Reverses the Gap

Generative retrieval (GR) has emerged as a strong candidate generator for sequential recommendation as language models and semantic-item identifiers have improved. However, GR is not a uniformly stronger replacement of dense retrieval (DR) in online retail candidate generation. We examine their differences on two Amazon Toys datasets under different metrics. GR leads on best relevant item value among users both methods cover, while DR leads on exact-target recall and relevant value across the ranked list. With deep analysis, we find that popularity contributes the most to GR's measured value lead. Adding the same static item value to DR in one reranking step reverses this lead and keeps r...

AuthorsRenbo Tu, Yang Liu, Shuying Sun
Primary categorycs.IR
Published13 October 2026
Last updated at source13 October 2026
cs.IRcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c81d9e41-2334-47c4-8e40-bd5eb648e519" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.