Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Why Do VLMs Fail at Remote Physiological Measurement? Rethinking with Physiological Grounding and Numerical Alignment

Video-based remote physiological measurement (RPM) has broad applications, while Vision-Language Models (VLMs) provide a promising opportunity to enable end-to-end physiological monitoring for future human-aware intelligent systems. However, existing RPM methods rely on task-specific models and cannot be seamlessly integrated with the multimodal understanding and interaction capabilities of VLMs. We revisit RPM with VLMs and provide empirical evidence for two major bottlenecks: generic visual semantic representations fail to preserve fine-grained physiological cues; while discrete token prediction in autoregressive generation is inherently misaligned with continuous numerical measurement....

AuthorsXiao Yang, Zekun Zhang, Yuxuan Fan et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published13 October 2026
Last updated at source13 October 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7a4498bb-838e-43c0-ad75-923ca6a373e2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.