Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

A Global View of How LLMs Value Human Time

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as personal assistants; however, little is known about how they capture national-level preferences on a global scale. Given that "time" is a universal and representative concept, we examine LLMs' time preferences by varying only users' country and measuring the compensation LLMs deem appropriate for a 60-minute appointment delay. We then compare LLMs' responses with GDP per capita on Purchasing Power Parity (GDP_PPP), Mean Income, and a literature-based index (Patience Score). Our results across 193 countries and 5 LLMs demonstrate that people's time across the world is evaluated in noticeably different ways among LLMs, as well as varying leve...

AuthorsYifan He, Manon Reusens, Sofie Goethals et al.
Primary categorycs.CY
Published13 October 2026
Last updated at source14 October 2026
cs.CYcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/4699e033-2d6c-4164-abe1-efcb59a4da28" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.