Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Lightweight but Linguistically Fair? Quantisation Robustness across Bavarian, German, and English

Post-training quantisation reduces the memory cost of large language models, but it remains unclear whether compression preserves language skills of regional varieties as reliably as their standard-language counterparts. We study this question for Bavarian, Standard German, and English using BAVGROUND, a multiple-choice benchmark, where 206 source questions are aligned across all three languages. Across 14 open-weight 7B--10B instruction models, we compare BF16 with 8-bit GPTQ and two 4-bit settings, GPTQ and AWQ. Eight-bit GPTQ remains close to BF16 and largely preserves the relative behaviour of the three languages, while 4-bit quantisation was found to be much less stable. The two 4-bi...

AuthorsJophin John, Michael Hoffmann, Piroska Lendvai et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published13 October 2026
Last updated at source13 October 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b90d310f-f785-4edf-8c55-8132c1ea5f3c" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.