Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

One-Sided Verification Under Limited Expert Review

AI has become increasingly helpful in scientific discovery, yet human expert review remains essential for those problems without reliable automated evaluation, posing a fundamental challenge as candidate generation scales beyond available review capacity. This paper studies verification under limited human effort, where rare valid solutions need to be prioritized while invalid candidates should be filtered out to reduce human workload. We adopt the one-sided verification objective that maximizes the rejection rate of invalid solutions (TNR) under a constraint on the false-rejection rate of valid ones (FNR), making human review cost an explicit term to minimize. Drawing on the intuition th...

AuthorsFan Nie, Haotian Ye, Shurui Liu et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published13 October 2026
Last updated at source13 October 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/3d35664d-5507-4913-bd77-096a004494ab" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.