Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Uncertainty Evaluation: Bridging Machine Learning and Measurement Science

Reliable uncertainty evaluation is essential for assessing the trustworthiness of machine learning (ML) predictions, particularly in safety-critical applications. This paper explores conceptual analogies between uncertainty evaluation in ML and measurement science, drawing on the evolution of metrology from error-based approaches to the framework established by the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). Particular attention is devoted to the distinction between process-level and result-level quality and to the limitations of the conventional classification of ML uncertainty into aleatoric and epistemic components. It is argued that this dichotomy, similarly to the tr...

AuthorsDario Petri, Luca Mari
Primary categorycs.LG
Published13 October 2026
Last updated at source13 October 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/09c196da-061c-4f26-8854-780def0deef0" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.