Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Can Machine Learning Potentials Be More Accurate Than the Methods They Are Trained On?

Although machine learning potentials (MLPs) generalize across configurational and chemical compound spaces, their accuracy is commonly believed to be limited by their training methods, with improvements beyond this limit achieved so far only by refitting to experimental observables. In this Perspective, we argue that MLPs can also be made more accurate than their training methods non-empirically by generalizing across a third space, that of quantum-chemical methods. We propose routes to method-transferable MLPs that predict at unseen methods, with working implementations in both density-functional and wavefunction-based theories showing that they can be more accurate than any of their tra...

AuthorsPavlo O. Dral, Yi-Fan Hou, Yuxinxin Chen et al.
Primary categoryphysics.chem-ph
Published13 October 2026
Last updated at source13 October 2026
physics.chem-phcs.AIcs.LGphysics.comp-ph
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/0425ac1b-a8e3-4471-b469-b07b0e0d781c" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.