Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Evaluating the Causal Faithfulness of SHAP as a Candidate Attribution Method for SAE Features

Sparse autoencoders decompose language model representations into interpretable features, but feature interpretation in this literature remains predominantly correlational. Attribution methods offer more direct estimates of feature influence, yet their faithfulness to actual causal effects has not been systematically evaluated in the SAE setting. We apply SHAP-based attribution to SAE latent features and evaluate it against direct causal intervention, using sentiment classification on SST-2 with GPT-2 Small and a 32,768-feature layer-7 SAE as a testbed. We compare SHAP to Integrated Gradients, Gradient$\times$Input, and probe-weight baselines across linear and MLP probe arms, scoring each...

AuthorsSamuel Xie, Noura Al-Moubayed
Primary categorycs.LG
Published13 October 2026
Last updated at source13 October 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/4fd3b5c5-0232-4f32-8ea4-b24d62e2ad86" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.