Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Benchmarking and Training Reward Models for Cross-Source Evidence Grounding in Search Agents

Existing approaches to training and evaluating search agents focus heavily on final-answer quality, largely neglecting how generated answers map back to retrieved evidence. Recent methods track citations to enforce grounding, but citation support alone does not establish source independence or whether an answer appropriately handles conflicting evidence. We argue that credibility in open-web retrieval depends on principled cross-source evidence grounding that accounts for source independence and systematically attributes and adjudicates conflicting evidence, while hierarchical judgments of these grounding decisions provide a unified signal for training and evaluation. To this end, we prop...

AuthorsHaochen Zhao, Minsheng Hao, Zheng Li et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published13 October 2026
Last updated at source13 October 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/318f33b0-8375-49fc-9515-90ac2d5a3f50" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.