Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Where Small Mistakes Matter: Quantifying State Criticality for Imitation Learning

Imitation learning typically treats every demonstration state as equally important, optimizing a behavior-cloning objective uniformly across the dataset. Yet not all states are created equal: in a small number of critical states, even a slight deviation from the expert action can lead to a failure, while in many other states such errors are recoverable and inconsequential. We formalize state criticality in imitation learning as the worst-case degradation in downstream value induced by a bounded perturbation of the expert action at a given state. We then propose SCRIM, a practical State CRIticality Measure that estimates this quantity by training an adversarial disturbance policy and a val...

AuthorsYusuf Umut Ciftci, Joonwon Kang, Ajay Suresha Sathya et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published13 October 2026
Last updated at source13 October 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.RO
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9021c5c1-162a-4940-ab63-7d6e28ade04e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.