Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

textGrain watermarking is harder to detect: can sum-tests still do it optimally?

Watermarking embeds an imperceptible signal in text from large language models that is statistically detectable with a secret key. The recent textGrain watermark (Li et. al. (2026b)) calibrates this signal against the model's sampling entropy through an explicit entropy budget, combining the stochasticity of Red-Green and the unbiasedness of Gumbel-max watermarks, and its accompanying report proposes a detector that sums pivotal statistics. We study when, and how efficiently, textGrain can be detected after human edits, modeled as a sparse mixture in which a fraction $\varepsilon_n\asymp n^{-p}$ of positions retain the watermark and token uncertainty decays as $n^{-q}$. First, entropy cal...

AuthorsSwapnaneel Bhattacharyya, Soham Bonnerjee
Primary categorystat.ML
Published13 October 2026
Last updated at source13 October 2026
stat.MLcs.ITcs.LGmath.STstat.ME
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/18b316b2-0b0d-40a6-aa6e-f62542698fd8" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.