Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

ToolHACE: A Dataset for Detecting Hallucinations in Tool-Based LLM Responses

Tool-augmented language models ground their responses in external tool outputs, improving reliability beyond parametric knowledge alone. However, even when the correct tool is called and returns accurate information, models may still contradict such outputs, omit critical details, or generate unsupported claims. Existing hallucination benchmarks for tool-augmented dialogue primarily focus on the tool-calling stage, evaluating whether the correct tool and arguments are selected, while overlooking errors that arise during post-tool response generation. To address this gap, we introduce ToolHACE, a span-level benchmark for hallucination detection in tool-augmented LLM responses, covering fiv...

AuthorsNikolay Ivanov, Sergey Pletenev, Elisei Rykov et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published12 October 2026
Last updated at source12 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9d636aef-5504-412a-b9c2-4e20c081b32b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.