Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Lost in Contrast: Instruction-Preserving Decoding for Reliable Visual Question Answering

Visual contrastive decoding corrects answers using the prediction difference between the original image and a reference condition, yet the same contrast also turns supported abstentions into incorrect answers. We find that abstentions are lost at two stages: contrastive decoding with candidate filtering can exclude the abstention token before any comparison takes place, and the reference branch's response to the abstention instruction is removed when the reference prediction is subtracted. We therefore propose instruction-preserving decoding, which keeps the effect of the abstention instruction on the original-image prediction intact while leaving the contrast strength freely adjustable. ...

AuthorsHaonan Zhang, Ting Jin, Wenzhong Tang et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published12 October 2026
Last updated at source12 October 2026
cs.CLcs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/eed3b646-72d7-4279-bc89-c9159b3fd7fe" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.