Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Not Every Cue Is Evidence: Cue Supportability for Forensic Distillation in Face Forgery Detection

Explainable face forgery detection requires not only correct judgments but also forensic evidence supported by the input image. However, training cues are typically derived from the forgery generation pipeline. Since images available to the model are of limited quality and resolution, it is difficult to observe the fine-grained traces these cues refer to. Training methods that further supply such cues as privileged supervision exacerbate the problem, as the student is taught to articulate evidence it cannot perceive. The student consequently resorts to templated or over-generalized expressions, giving rise to the correct-answer, wrong-evidence (CAWE) failure. We propose a dual supportabil...

AuthorsBinjia Zhou, Dawei Luo, Shuai Chen et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published12 October 2026
Last updated at source12 October 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fcd26887-b32b-49c2-b0a0-fc57dd84b049" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.