Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

AuthGateBench: Benchmarking LLMs as Authorization Gate

Automated approval systems let coding agents execute high-risk actions with minimal human oversight by delegating the authorization decision to a classifier, typically a large language model (LLM). Such systems, adopted in tools like Claude Code and Codex, remain vulnerable to failure modes such as scope escalation, where the agent takes actions exceeding what the user authorized. Existing benchmarks focus mainly on malicious requests, evaluating refusal under an implicit policy. We introduce AuthGateBench, the first policy-guided benchmark for authorization gating under benign requests. We implement a novel pipeline where an LLM generates contrast pairs with identical action and trajecto...

AuthorsZhixiong Zhuang, Jin Jia, Zhiwei Shang et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published12 October 2026
Last updated at source12 October 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/25a26eb4-79ab-443f-98bb-64d6f4632061" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.