Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Efficient Multi-Agent Reasoning via Confidence-Guided Adaptive Debate

Multi-agent debate has shown promise for improving the reasoning of large language models, yet recent theory suggests its benefits are highly regime-dependent. While interaction can amplify informative signals under corrective conditions, symmetric debate dynamics are neutral in expectation, often making majority voting preferable. We reconcile these views by arguing that debate is effective only when invoked at the right time and with appropriate structure. Based on this insight, we propose LASE: Leader-Adaptive Structured Engagement, a leader-centric multi-agent debate framework that selectively engages interaction only in non-neutral regimes. LASE introduces an asymmetric leader-suppor...

AuthorsSeungdong Yoa, Ye Seul Sim, Suhee Yoon et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published12 October 2026
Last updated at source12 October 2026
cs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/25fea7f9-be03-4feb-bfca-765fab56cb38" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.