Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Phantom Merge: When Your Large Language Model Agents Pick One but Tell You About Another

LLM agents increasingly operate over multiple entities, where reliable response generation requires not only retrieving relevant evidence but also preserving its association with the correct entity. We identify Phantom Merge (PM), an entity-evidence binding failure in which an agent attributes unsupported claims to its committed entity, potentially even when the task is completed correctly. We formalize PM at the claim level and characterize its prevalence and error subtypes across four agent domains and four backbone families. To address this problem, we propose a two-stage framework for claim-level risk estimation and correction. First, Anchor-Grounded Risk (AGR) combines a representati...

AuthorsWangshu Zhu, Qianwen Guo, Yushun Dong
Primary categorycs.AI
Published12 October 2026
Last updated at source12 October 2026
cs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a776bb2d-15cf-44a1-957b-1c82198e35e7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 15 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.