Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Computational Reflective Equilibrium for Agentic AI: A Rawlsian Alignment Scaffold for Governance

The rapid deployment of agentic AI has introduced complex challenges for the ethics and governance of AI systems. Agents built on large language models act through tools on behalf of people, and each deployment case brings its own instructions, policies, evidence, and stakeholders, so alignment must be formed case by case. To this end, this work proposes agentic reflective equilibrium (ARE), a computational reflective equilibrium framework that serves as an ethical alignment scaffold in the agent harness. Drawing inspiration from the reflective equilibrium of John Rawls, the scaffold links principles from the system prompt and operator policy, considered judgments, tool evidence, and cand...

AuthorsQuanyan Zhu
Primary categorycs.AI
Published12 October 2026
Last updated at source12 October 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/510fb516-32b6-4b39-a908-8c5d31721122" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 14 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.