Passing Tests, Missing Semantics: Evidence of Interpretive Lock-In in Plan-Based DataFrame Code Generation
Planning and revision are intended to bring generated code closer to the task specification. Yet a mistaken interpretation can persist across the plan, implementation, and tests - a pattern we call interpretive lock-in. We investigate this risk on 30 DataFrame tasks derived from TPC Benchmark DS, comparing Frozen One-Pass, Test-Guided Revision, and PlanAudit-Guided Revision. Test-pass counts rose from 22/30 to 29/30 and 30/30, yet no generated solution matched its stored reference output. Evaluator controls returned the expected outcome in 57/57 cases. Same-engine SQL re-execution reproduced 28/30 references; all 77 test-passing runs on these tasks still failed reference agreement. PlanAu...
| Authors | Jingjing, Liu, Dishu Yang et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.AI |
| Published | 11 October 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 11 October 2026 |
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 14 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.