Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Sensitivity Fidelity Reveals Physical Dependencies Beyond Forecast Accuracy in Deep-Learning Earth-System Models

Deep-learning models increasingly rival numerical simulation in Earth-system forecasting, yet forecast error alone cannot determine whether their learned input-output dependencies are physically consistent. Here we introduce sensitivity fidelity as an additional criterion: alongside prediction error, model responses to input perturbations should be examined against a trusted reference or established physical knowledge. In an idealized Rayleigh-Bénard convection benchmark, four surrogate architectures achieved low forecast errors yet encoded markedly different sensitivities. Quantitative comparison with a matched adjoint distinguished the models far more sharply than forecast accuracy and ...

AuthorsQi Chen, Peng Zhan, Hongxing Cui et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published11 October 2026
Last updated at source11 October 2026
cs.LGphysics.ao-phphysics.geo-ph
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/069abb0a-b78a-4736-94e3-a77fa6032c1f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 14 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.