Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Rethinking Opinion Measurement Interfaces for Human-in-the-Loop Optimization

Human-in-the-loop optimization refers to systems that present choices to a human decision-maker and query their judgment to optimize system parameters iteratively. The user interface typically provides either an absolute rating scale or asks for a preferred option. However, these approaches can potentially suffer from calibration problems, inconsistencies, and completeness violations of user preferences in such a sequential evaluation. This paper revisits the design space of opinion measurement interfaces for human-in-the-loop optimization. We conducted a study (N=360) using text summarization and image color enhancement tasks to evaluate human sequential feedback in six representative op...

AuthorsChangkun Ou, Sven Mayer, Daniel Buschek et al.
Primary categorycs.HC
Published10 October 2026
Last updated at source10 October 2026
cs.HCcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c954b5bf-fb9b-461f-8463-9024b57c96c4" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.