Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Fine-Tuning Strategy, Not Just Data: A Statistically Rigorous Audit of Gender and Stereotypical Bias in Embedding Models for HR Recommendation Systems

Embedding models underpin modern job-candidate matching: resumes, job descriptions, and queries are encoded as dense vectors, and recommendations come from nearest-neighbor retrieval over that space. Any social bias in the embeddings therefore feeds directly into HR recommendations. We audit six multilingual sentence-embedding models (LaBSE- and E5-family, both public and custom fine-tuned) using Bias-in-Bios (occupational gender bias) and StereoSet (stereotypes across profession, race, gender, and religion). We treat statistical validity as a first-class concern: we identify a non-independence error in a naive significance test, where pooling non-independent pairwise similarities inflate...

AuthorsEkta Yadav
Primary categorycs.IR
Published10 October 2026
Last updated at source10 October 2026
cs.IRcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7f9aacb0-cd53-48d8-b91e-0f189028abf4" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.