Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Measuring the Inference Energy Efficiency of Open-Weight LLMs across Benchmarks, Reasoning Modes, and Hardware

Benchmark scores tell us what an LLM can do, but not how much energy is required to deliver that capability. We directly measure this trade-off for 86 open-weight model checkpoints, evaluated on seven benchmarks and six hardware platforms ranging from a consumer GPU to an eight-GPU server. We find large differences in energy efficiency even among models with similar capability. Most configurations lie away from the score--energy Pareto frontier: they use a median of 2.6--4.8$\times$ more energy than another configuration that scores at least as well, with differences reaching 27$\times$. Reasoning can improve capability, but enabling thinking increases energy by about 3.7$\times$ on avera...

AuthorsZeyu Yang, Wes Armour
Primary categorycs.AI
Published9 October 2026
Last updated at source9 October 2026
cs.AIcs.PF
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b971006b-e3df-4f79-9fbf-5d364ff60f7b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.