Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Error Rate is Not Enough: Costs of Augmentation in Low-Resource ASR

Data augmentation is standard practice for low-resource automatic speech recognition (ASR), but its benefits are almost always reported as aggregate error rates, leaving open why and when a method helps. On four low-resource languages and English at five data sizes, we cross two augmentations that modify existing audio (speed perturbation and SpecAugment) with two that modify text transcriptions and synthesize audio from it. We analyze errors at the phoneme level and find that they help for complementary reasons. SpecAugment has the most reliable aggregate improvements, but increases tone and palatalization errors, whereas text-based methods introduce consonant insertions; in combination,...

AuthorsKatsumi Ibaraki, David Chiang
Primary categorycs.CL
Published9 October 2026
Last updated at source9 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/843336e3-2436-4389-816c-8e8ac0097886" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.