Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Attention Sees, MLP Refuses: Tracing the Attention-to-MLP Safety Pathway in LLMs

Safety-aligned large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreaks and can over-refuse benign requests. Understanding these failures requires distinguishing harmfulness recognition from the computation that writes refusal. We reframe this as a pathway question and make it measurable on residual-stream updates in decoder-only Transformers, separating the harmfulness information a module update exposes from the change it produces in readable refusal evidence. Across 18 Base-Instruct pairs spanning Qwen, Llama, and Gemma, harmfulness is decoded more readily from attention updates, particularly in early layers, whereas MLP updates contribute more strongly to harm-selective refusal wr...

AuthorsZixuan Weng, Haoqi He, Weifei Jin et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published9 October 2026
Last updated at source9 October 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a1471eff-3afa-4af1-876b-4838e3f7a433" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.