Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Don't Guess, Just Ask: Evaluating Interactive Requirement Clarification for Repository-Level Software Development

As LLMs become increasingly capable of implementing software, a critical bottleneck emerges: whether they truly understand what users want. Users often begin with vague intent, leaving important requirements to be clarified through interaction. In repository-level development, misunderstandings can propagate and cause costly rework. However, existing benchmarks typically evaluate implementation from complete specifications or underspecified requests, overlooking pre-coding requirement clarification. Prior clarification studies mainly focus on function-level tasks. It therefore remains unclear how well LLMs can transform vague intent into clear requirements through interaction and how this...

AuthorsMingyu Chen, Zhiqing Zhong, Manyi Wang et al.
Primary categorycs.SE
Published9 October 2026
Last updated at source9 October 2026
cs.SEcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f17d3cb9-50a2-4d0a-b9eb-bec82aeb5f95" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.