Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Can Decision Models Understand Stance? Evaluating Jev Against General-Purpose LLMs

Stance detection requires identifying an author's attitude toward a given target, sometimes based on conversational context. Jev, a specialized decision model designed for structured decision-making, offers an alternative to general-purpose large language models (LLMs). In this work, we evaluate Jev on two stance detection datasets, VAST (English texts) and ZS-CSD (Chinese conversations), comparing it with four general-purpose LLMs and two fine-tuned models. Results show that Jev achieves competitive performance on VAST, matching GPT-5.6 and outperforming the other general-purpose LLMs. However, it falls behind stronger LLMs on ZS-CSD, particularly in distinguishing favor from against. Fu...

AuthorsXing Li, Jinzhong Ning, Yijia Zhang et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published8 October 2026
Last updated at source8 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/71edb14d-a9c5-48cd-a4a5-3c1633042811" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.