Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

RAG-Stress: Probing the Limits of Evidence Reliance in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Following retrieved evidence does not guarantee factual correctness: misleading evidence can induce a model to replace an answer it previously gave correctly. Standard accuracy measures obscure this behavior by combining answer replacement with preexisting errors. We introduce RAG-Stress, a controlled diagnostic protocol for examining the limits of evidence reliance in retrieval-augmented generation. The protocol holds the question and reference answer fixed, edits one assertion to support a designated incorrect answer, and crosses two source priority policies with three positions of the answer span within the evidence text. We measure misleading rate (MR) on each model's subset of questi...

AuthorsShunyuan Zhou, Hao Chen, Tianyu Wang et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published8 October 2026
Last updated at source8 October 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d038928c-5c7e-4da1-85db-d789f107cf4e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.