Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Rethinking the Tradeoff Between Temporal Encoding and Nonlinear Computation in Spiking Language Models

Spiking language models face a tradeoff between representing continuous semantic features over short temporal windows and retaining costly nonlinear attention operations. We introduce Spora, which jointly designs spike encodings and attention operators. Binary temporal weights let $T$ spikes represent compositional values with up to $T$ bits of capacity, compared with $O(\log_2 T)$ bits for spike-count readout. Unipolar Binary Spiking (UBS) uses thresholds and spike-triggered residual decay to produce non-negative integer codes; Bipolar Binary Spiking (BBS) separates sign and magnitude and learns a scale for signed activations. These representations support accumulation-and-shift dot prod...

AuthorsHanfei Liu, Shuchang Feng, Yanxia Chen et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published7 October 2026
Last updated at source7 October 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fc29f202-cfbb-4b57-88c2-5b95aae5c760" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.