Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Reasoning-Token Spikes Under Prompted Untruthful Responses in Large Language Models

Monitoring the chain-of-thought of reasoning artificial intelligence (AI) models remains a key approach to detecting deception and other forms of misbehavior in such models. However, semantic chain-of-thought monitoring depends on reasoning traces being legible and sufficiently faithful to the underlying computations that produced the model's behavior, not to mention accessible. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that chain-of-thought outputs may soon become illegible or unfaithful, if they even remain accessible. Based on cognitive load theory, we investigate a lower-bandwidth signal--the number of reasoning tokens generated--which does not require access to the content of the reason...

AuthorsMaverick Morales, Tomáš Dominik, Vermut Gao et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published7 October 2026
Last updated at source9 October 2026
cs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/be73f21e-49b4-4865-b506-b772c1091fb5" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.