Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Shared and structured inputs undermine collective random choice by reasoning AI agents

Random selection is widely used in resource allocation and auditing, making reliable implementation essential for AI-agent systems. Behavioural tests across six reasoning models uncovered threshold and divisibility rules used in identifier-based choices. For threshold-following GPT-6 Sol and Gemini 3.8 Flash, single-agent measurements prospectively predicted correlated participation under shared identifiers and biased participation under distinct identifiers with common timestamp bits. Changing dates, formats and identifier labels revealed when these predictions held. Explicit instructions to randomize independently reduced but did not eliminate shared-input correlation. To test implicati...

AuthorsTakahiro Ezaki, Naoto Imura, Katsuhiro Nishinari
Primary categorycs.AI
Published7 October 2026
Last updated at source7 October 2026
cs.AIphysics.soc-ph
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bdd3c27c-000d-480d-b7c8-4aac00aa5f64" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.