Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Correct Answers, Unsupported Findings: Evidence Binding in Forensic Reconstruction of LLM Agent Logs

Forensic reconstruction of LLM-agent actions requires not only recovering the correct value, but establishing which preserved record supports that finding. Tool logs, generated explanations, and local citation identifiers capture different parts of this evidence, yet a citation identifier does not establish a source unless its binding to a record is preserved. We audit this distinction using 64 mechanically checkable cases from saved AgentDojo Banking executions. Two LLM readers reconstruct source relationships under controlled variations in visible evidence and identifier-to-record bindings. We separately evaluate complete-record agreement, evidence-grounded findings, justified abstentio...

AuthorsTaehyeon Yun, Dongho Kim, Geonwoo Kim et al.
Primary categorycs.CR
Published7 October 2026
Last updated at source7 October 2026
cs.CRcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/879247fd-655c-4a70-8dac-de9bc50fe50c" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.