Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

A Framework for the Systematic Review of ML Assets in AI Registries

Background: Modern software systems increasingly rely on Machine Learning (ML) assets (i.e., pre-trained models, datasets, benchmarks) for building, evaluating, and integrating ML-based systems. However, current exploration, selection and reuse practices of ML assets are not supported by systematic retrieval methodologies comparable to those used in traditional evidence synthesis. Consequently, in practice, ML asset selection is often presented as a settled design decision, supported by informal justification rather than a traceable, evidence-based, and updatable selection process. Aims: This paper explores how systematic review methods can support ML asset retrieval. In doing so, we aim ...

AuthorsAlexandra González, Quim Motger, Xavier Franch et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published7 October 2026
Last updated at source7 October 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/704acf06-7401-4968-a399-43332ea18515" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.