Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Finding the Right Balance: Relevance and Diversity in LLM Retrieval

Retrieval diversification is widely available in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks, yet prior studies disagree on whether it improves retrieval and answer quality. We show that its effectiveness varies primarily with candidate-pool redundancy, in a pattern consistent with the number of distinct evidence pieces a query requires. Using controlled near-duplicate injection and production-style overlapping chunking, we find that diversification harms relevance, evidence coverage and answer quality on clean pools, but becomes beneficial on multi-evidence tasks when redundancy causes nearest-neighbor retrieval to select repeated passages. We therefore introduce a query-adaptive rul...

AuthorsGuillaume Brouillette, Faustin Kagabo, Usef Faghihi et al.
Primary categorycs.IR
Published7 October 2026
Last updated at source7 October 2026
cs.IRcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c34b524e-50ed-42e4-a9b7-cff1a786e1e8" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.