Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Careful Judge: Safe and Efficient Human-AI Collaborative Decision Making

In human-AI collaborative decision making, human review can prevent unsafe AI decisions, but each human judgment is costly. Treating human intervention after AI abstention as a one-off fallback misses the opportunity to improve future AI decisions for greater automation, yet AI adaptively learning from selectively queried human feedback breaks safety guardrails calibrated for old models. We approach this challenge with CARE---calibrated adaptive rectification and escalation---an end-to-end pipeline that combines AI models and human reviewers to guarantee safe, human-aligned decisions, while continuously learning from human feedback to achieve greater automation with fewer human queries. C...

AuthorsChenyu Zhang, Rachel Luo, Boyi Li et al.
Primary categorystat.ML
Published6 October 2026
Last updated at source6 October 2026
stat.MLcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a86af688-98c4-4d2e-a83a-1895e7616612" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.