Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Learning from Failures: A Failure-Driven Prompt Refinement for LLM-Based Vulnerability Analysis

Large Language Models have emerged as promising tools for software vulnerability analysis, but their effectiveness depends heavily on prompt design. Existing research primarily compares prompting strategies using aggregate performance metrics, providing limited insight into why models fail or how prompts can be improved systematically. We propose Failure-Driven Prompt Refinement (FDPR), a methodology that analyzes recurring model failures to guide evidence-based prompt refinement. Using the Damn Vulnerable Java Application (DVJA), we identify recurring failure modes, including false positives, false negatives, unsupported reasoning, and CWE misclassification, and translate them into targe...

AuthorsMandana Ghadamian, David Mohaisen
Primary categorycs.SE
Published6 October 2026
Last updated at source6 October 2026
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CR
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e435e441-1930-44f7-8518-a70b85fc89f5" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.