Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Beyond the Leaderboard: Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Dense and Mixture-of-Experts Models for Automated Program Repair

Automated Program Repair (APR) with language models is usually evaluated by whether a generated patch passes the test suite, which can hide differences in maintainability, security, and computational cost. We propose a Weighted Quality Index (QI), inspired by the ISO/IEC 25010 software quality model, that combines functional correctness, maintainability, security, and generation efficiency under configurable weighting schemes. We evaluate three dense Qwen2.5-Coder models (3B, 7B, 14B) and the 16B-parameter DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model (2.4B active parameters) on 40 QuixBugs and 90 Defects4J bugs, all run locally on identical hardware to control for infrastructure ...

AuthorsAnvi Kalpesh Shah, Umamaheswara Sharma B
Primary categorycs.SE
Published6 October 2026
Last updated at source6 October 2026
cs.SEcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/73e2f4d6-639f-4d61-8a48-18eb826d05a3" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.