Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Learning a Ranking from Human Feedback in Log-Concave Random Utility Models

We study the problem of recovering the ranking of a fixed set of items according to their unknown numerical utilities. At each interaction with the environment, a learner presents the item set to a human and receives comparative feedback of two types. Under full-ranking feedback, each interaction reveals a noisy ranking of all items, whereas under winner-only feedback, it reveals only the item ranked first. In both settings, we model human feedback using a random utility model with log-concave noise and study the number of observations needed to recover an $ε$-accurate ranking with high probability. This novel criterion tolerates ordering errors only between items whose utilities differ b...

AuthorsDiego Alovisetti, Marco Mussi, Alberto Maria Metelli
Primary categorycs.LG
Published6 October 2026
Last updated at source6 October 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9b6cd7f1-79f2-4f28-a917-863675da771e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.