Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Pseudowords as probes: Large Language Models show little of the sublexical sensitivity that governs human pseudoword processing

Systematicity, the probabilistic mapping of form to meaning, permeates language at all levels, and sublexical cues have been shown to govern human pseudoword processing. Yet whether LLMs exhibit comparable sensitivity to these cues remains unclear. We tested five LLMs on two Italian two-alternative forced-choice pseudoword experiments and compared their responses with a human behavioural baseline. LLMs aligned more reliably with humans when real-word options provided a lexical familiarity cue than in the pseudoword-only condition, where they fell substantially below fastText, a character-n-gram model. In addition, the sublexical cosine-similarity cue that reliably drove human--fastText ag...

AuthorsJing Chen, Giulia Loca, Simona Amenta et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published6 October 2026
Last updated at source6 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/cf5f56fd-7557-41b7-899c-114dc0474f99" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.