Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Mechanistic Interpretability of Atmospheric Rivers in GraphCast

While AI weather models now rival operational forecasts, how they represent the atmosphere internally remains an open question: feature attribution reveals which input patterns matter, not what the model computes or how it combines information internally. We train sparse autoencoders (SAEs) on GraphCast to uncover its learned concepts, using atmospheric rivers as our phenomenon of focus. Both standard and Matryoshka SAEs show GraphCast computes atmospheric river intensity, measured by integrated vapor transport (IVT), as a stable internal variable, despite IVT being neither an input nor a target. In contrast to the unstructured concept retrieval of the standard SAE, the Matryoshka SAE ord...

AuthorsMadelyn Mathai, Timothy B. Higgins, Kevin M. Grise et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published6 October 2026
Last updated at source6 October 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bfdebe74-5b47-4dfd-927a-02bccdb19390" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.