Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Can Power Draw Constrain Covert Compute? Limits of Analogue Verification for AI Governance

Frontier AI treaties or agreements on limiting computation require external verification; an external auditor must be able to confirm how much computation actually ran and that parties are adhering to the agreement. Analogue, off-chip measurements such as power draw provide an information channel for verification. It is unknown how well these analogue channels can constrain computation against an adversary who actively tries to subvert the audit. We derive a closed form for $β$, the largest hidden computation a power trace cannot exclude, as a fraction of the declared machine capacity. Measurements on NVIDIA A100 GPUs constrain $β= 1.16$ in the worst case, while adversarial matched-energy...

AuthorsTom Kimpson, Mauricio Baker, Emlyn Graham
Primary categorycs.CY
Published5 October 2026
Last updated at source5 October 2026
cs.CYcs.AIcs.CR
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7768b47c-63c2-4401-b04b-989be407992e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.