Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Neural Fields Encode Adaptation Geometry

Neural fields are usually evaluated by how well they reconstruct an observation. We show that this misses two useful properties of a fitted network: how easily it can adapt to new observations, and what its weights retain from earlier ones. We study these properties as adaptation geometry. For images, we meta-learn class-specific initializations, adapt each one to a new image, and measure how much the network must change to fit it. A simple local linear model closely predicts this adaptation cost, while replacing one network's tangent kernel with another's substantially worsens the prediction. Adaptation thus depends on the local geometry of the fitted network, not only on its current rec...

AuthorsPrateik Sinha, Stefania Druga
Primary categorycs.LG
Published5 October 2026
Last updated at source5 October 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/eb357e21-2169-4b01-be8b-6167dffb2a1d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.