Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Aggregating User Preferences while Ensuring Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion using Graph Summarization

Aggregating the preferences of diverse user groups into a collective outcome raises fundamental challenges of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI): classical aggregation rules such as Borda and Condorcet have no mechanism to prevent results from systematically favoring majority groups, collapsing onto homogeneous items, or under-representing minorities. We address this problem through EDI-constrained graph summarization. User preferences are modeled as a weighted attributed bipartite graph, and a greedy coarsening algorithm iteratively merges user nodes while enforcing three structural EDI criteria: an equity gap constraint ($ΔE$), an intra-list diversity constraint (ILD), and a group i...

AuthorsAdji Marieme Sita Cissé, Malek Mouhoub
Primary categorycs.SI
Published5 October 2026
Last updated at source5 October 2026
cs.SIcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a86b6c63-e9ee-4bd4-917f-610756c8c515" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.