Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Video Encoders Built on Image Representations

The design of a video encoder determines when frames begin to interact and which frame-specific visual evidence remains accessible to the language model. Native video pathways couple neighboring frames during visual encoding, whereas image pathways preserve independently computed frame representations but incur a much larger visual-token cost when all image tokens are forwarded. We ask a basic question: whether a compact video encoder can instead be built on image representations. To answer this question, we separate three operations that are often coupled: per-frame representation, cross-frame token allocation, and temporal interaction. A frozen image encoder first produces frame-specifi...

AuthorsJusheng Zhang, Wenhao Wang, Longqi Cai et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published5 October 2026
Last updated at source5 October 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/75a02474-a4db-4e3c-a5b9-d1f472f15595" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.